How effective is measles immunisation.
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
How Effective is Clinical Supervision in Nursing? A Systematic Review
Background: Clinical supervision is a process of learning and professional support for nurses in developing their practice through regular discussions with experienced and knowledgeable colleagues. However, it remains challenging to ensure the effectiveness of its implementation across healthcare organizations. This review is going to answer the question: What effect does clinical supervision h...
متن کاملA measles epidemic controlled by immunisation.
AIM In 1997, an immunisation campaign, using measles-mumps-rubella vaccine, was planned for children aged 2-10 years to prevent a measles epidemic predicted by mathematical modelling. The epidemic started before the campaign and is described here. METHOD Measles hospitalisation, notification and laboratory data were combined. RESULTS The epidemic started in April 1997 and was largely over b...
متن کاملMeasles immunisation: why have we failed?
Measles is still a significant cause of illness in British children although a safe and effective vaccine has been available here since 1968. 1982 was a particularly bad year with a steep increase in the notification rate of measles that probably represents only a fraction of the real incidence. Thousands of children have been ill; many have had troublesome complications; and a few may even hav...
متن کاملHow effective is suffixing?
s and titles from the Cranfield collection (with 225 queries and 1400 documents), comprised the major test collection for this study. The Medlars collection (30 queries and 1033 documents), and the CACM collection (64 queries and 3204 documents) were used to provide information about the variation of stemming performance across different subject areas and test collections. In addition to the st...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: BMJ
سال: 1977
ISSN: 0959-8138,1468-5833
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.1.6072.1347